fgemods (
fgemods) wrote in
fandomgrowthexchange2018-07-09 08:29 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Evidence Post
Nominations open here!
Are you nominating a fandom, character or relationship that may appear ineligible? Please use this post to submit evidence that it qualifies under our rules. It would be a good idea to post here if your fandom, character or relationship has more than 10 works (complete, in English) but:
For more information on what fandoms, characters and relationships are eligible, please see the rules post.
A suggested template for your post:
If something you've nominated has already been rejected, please leave a comment on the Rejected Nominations Post [tba].
Are you nominating a fandom, character or relationship that may appear ineligible? Please use this post to submit evidence that it qualifies under our rules. It would be a good idea to post here if your fandom, character or relationship has more than 10 works (complete, in English) but:
- They have been written by five authors or fewer
- They contain crossovers
- Your nominated character/relationship is not the main character/relationship in some of those works.
For more information on what fandoms, characters and relationships are eligible, please see the rules post.
A suggested template for your post:
If something you've nominated has already been rejected, please leave a comment on the Rejected Nominations Post [tba].
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-15 05:18 pm (UTC)(link)Fandom: Gravity Falls
Character/Relationship: Daryl Blubs/Edwin Durland
Evidence of Eligibility: Blubs/Durland are a minor canon pairing and frequently show up as a background pairing in fic because of this. However, of the 25 fics that come up in their tag on AO3, only 7 feature them in more than a background role, and they are only the main characters of 5.
no subject
(I think your "accidental" posting is probably because we accidentally had the link to the 2017 post in the clarifications post - so thanks for helping us notice that; it's fixed now.)